Cloud Computing - Crossing Over?

It’s a testament to the times that as a new burgeoning technology is hatched by an “army of geeks” in a caffeine drenched frenzy, I can have a conversation at a party with a lawyer from a completely different field and find that he already has a rudimentary grasp of that technology - Cloud Computing.

Even if I normalize for the natural demographic skew of my location (San Francisco), it is impressive to consider how quickly this phenomenon has progressed towards the mainstream.  Clearly, the message has a lot to do with the rate of transmission.  “Software-as-a-Service”, or worse “SaaS”, didn’t catch the imagination as well as Cloud has done.  Which is ironic, considering SaaS is actually what the consumer/user really touches, and what was originally represented by “The Cloud” - a metaphor for all of the networking, server hardware, storage, and software bits and bobs that no one really wants to know about.  As I said in a previous post, it really does matter what you call something.

So I looked around for some other indicators of “Cloud Computing” crossing the chasm from geekland to consumerland, and didn’t find very many.

So we’re still very much at the edge of mainstream consciousness.  I guess a real litmus test would be a mention on Oprah’s website - but we still need to wait for that.  (There is a lone comment on one of the forums that I’m sure left the other participants scratching their heads.)
Have you seen any signs out there that the mainstream is starting to hear about and maybe understand Cloud Computing?

Connect with me:

Posted under cloud, marketing

This post was written by James Colgan on August 31, 2010

Tags: ,

Imagination and Creative Genius

This is really a break from the usual….

Not owning a TV “link” (cable or dish) we have the great fortune to miss all commercials (thanks Netflix, Hulu, YouTube, Vimeo, and the good-ol’ web!).  The downside is, I miss some of the most intense distillations of creative genius…the commerical.

Fortunately, thanks to a friend of mine via one of my favorite social media channels, I’m able to catch up for a chance to chuckle, wonder, and be inspired.

A small collection by Michel Gondry.

Enjoy!

Leave your box to think outside of it.

- James

Connect with me:

Posted under Social Media Marketing

This post was written by James Colgan on August 30, 2010

Tags: ,

The Next Wave in Social?

There was a time when everyone was hot about “Location-based Advertising”.  Well, everyone’s still trying to crack that chestnut, and maybe this is a way to do it - Location-based Micro-Blogging.  This is better known as an application called FourSquare, or its closest competitor Gowalla.

Think of FourSqaure as Twitter meets Google Maps with an added gaming concept that reminds me of the old treasure hunts I used to go on as a child with my parents…but without the clues.  Essentially, when you arrive at an establishment, or your home, or your office, or where ever, you use an app running on your smartphone to “check-in”.  That act of checking into that location is then published to the rest of your social network.  You also have the opportunity to receive some points and a virtual badge of honor.  Last, but not least, you can provide a Tip to visitors of the establishment (for more points), or simply post a status update.

Of course, the obvious question is, “Why?”.  But then again, why do we do anything?  Why do we Tweet?  Why do we post videos to YouTube?  Why am I writing this blog?

To be honest, that’s not a very pragmatic question (although it will lead to very deep understanding of what is driving Social CRM, or Social Customer Relationship Management).  Businesses today are trying to get their head around the “How?”, as in “How can I leverage this?”.

Before we delve into the depths of this topic, I think it fair to share some information about whether your business should care.  As usual, we’re at the very beginning of this new technology adoption curve and there’s a long way to go.  Here are some statistics put out recently by RJ Metrics.

As you will see, the numbers are not overwhelming compared to say Facebook, but my guess is that if you’re in the San Francisco Bay Area, this form of market engagement could get very relevant relatively quickly.

Foursquare

  • Number of users: 1.9 million
  • Number of registered venues: 5.6 million
  • Check-ins: 1/3 of venues only once or never
  • Most popular venues: Home or fast food establishments
Of course, we need to look at the growth rate - it’s high, and stable, as this graph from RJMetrics shows.

Posted under Social Media Marketing, marketing

This post was written by James Colgan on July 14, 2010

Tags: , , , ,

Personae - Who Are Your Customers?

As an Enterprise Software marketing or sales professional, do you know who your customers are?  Do you know how to engage them?  They sound like rookie questions, but for a Social Media Marketing strategy to work (or any marketing strategy for that matter) we need to deeply understand this as a marketing organization.  And we do this by creating Customer Personae.

In traditional marketing, we characterized our customers to understand what they wanted and how to reach them.  If we understood what they wanted, we knew what product to develop.  And once we understood how to reach them, we’d then pitch our product with all its glorious features with the hope that they would buy.  Classically, the four P’s process - product, place, price, promotion.
In Social Media Marketing this is not an effective approach, because Social Media Marketing is not about your products.  Your customers take center stage of the conversation.  But wait a minute, in Social Media Marketing, your customers are not really customers at all!  They’re your community!  It’s becoming a cliche, but it’s very important to think in these terms, as it helps to set the stage for the content you are to create and how you are going to engage them.
By illustration, if you were to go into your local community gathering place and meet people there for the first time, you wouldn’t just start pitching your products or services at them.  You’d start a conversation with someone in the same way you would any other - you’d find out about them.  Find out what’s going on in their lives, and along the way maybe you’d relate a similar story of your own - the contractor that actually finished the kitchen remodel on time and within budget!  ”What’s your email address?  I’ll send you his contact information.”  This is how Social Media Marketing works.

Back to creating your personae.  Why are we doing this again?  To step into customer shoes to better understand how they make buying decisions.  We also want to discover topics and subjects that each persona would be interested in (your product is not an interesting topic, by the way…not yet).
As an Enterprise Software vendor, your community isn’t just your users.  Your target community contains everybody that comes into contact with your product, the users of your product, your company, your personnel, and your brand in general.

Think beyond the sales cycle, and extend your persona map to the life-cycle of the product.

Traditionally, within the Sales Cycle, you would find the following personae: User, Decision Maker, Evaluator, Gatekeeper, Influencer, etc.  These are important people to understand and list, but there are more that you need to consider for the life-cycle of Enterprise Software - IT, Legal, Accounts Payable, Finance, for example.

Once you have listed up these different personae, create representative biographies for each (not job descriptions!).  At the top of each biography call out their goals or aspirations.  Underneath that describe things like their background, their daily routines, problems they regularly encounter, current solutions that they use, etc.  Create as detailed a picture as you can as this will be a key source of content ideas.
Underneath the description, detail how they typically get and absorb information.  Is it videos?  Presentations?  Online Forums? White Papers? Demonstrations?  Product evaluations?  From this list you will be able to determine the form in which your content should take.
Last, but not least, list the ways in which each persona can be reached and how they prefer to be reached (or engaged).  The communication map for your market will be wide and varied.  However, one thing is almost certain - your original assumptions are probably wrong.  At least in the spread.
Your community is using Facebook, they are on LinkedIn, they are in forums, they are on Twitter, and they’re probably using email less and less.  They’re hardly ever reading paper magazines (what few still exist), and very few of them as a percentage go to conferences and trade shows.
Forbes, in collaboration with Google, put out a very interesting study on executives’ use of the internet. Anecdotally, this is a demographic that is not supposed to be online.  Read the report for the full scoop, but here are some interesting statistics that indicate that only one thing is constant - change.
(As an aside, in the report they refer to different generational personae as Generation Wang, Generation PC, and Generation Netscape.)
So, in summary, before you embark on your Social Media Marketing strategy, and once you have your objectives written down, create personae for each of your community types (customer).  Include as many as make sense from both the sales cycle and the product life-cycle.  (You may discover some hidden gems in the latter.)  Once you have done this, you will have a good starting point for not only the types of content you should be developing, but also how you should be reaching your community.

A final note - To do an effective job of this, you have to get out of the conference room, out of the office, and talk to your customers.  If you don’t, you’re just guessing.
[Photo credit: James Cridland]

Connect with me:

Posted under Social Media Marketing

This post was written by James Colgan on July 6, 2010

Tags: , , ,

Social Media Marketing and the Techno-Bubble

For many of us, to say that Social Media Marketing is “Right here, right now” would appear anachronistic.  But a conversation I had recently reminded me that for Hi-Tech the Techno-bubble we live in can sometimes operate in reverse.

When the Techno-bubble is behaving normally, “everyone” inside the bubble rushes out to buy the latest gadget, or adopts SaaS CRM (or whatever) the moment it comes out.  And then we assume everyone else on the planet has the same gadget and know exactly how to use salesforce.com (or whatever).  “Heck, hasn’t everyone written an iPhone App already?”, we think.

And then you pick up the phone and say, “blah, blah, blah Cloud, blah, blah, blah” to your artist/doctor/lawyer cousin and wonder why the phone went quiet.  (Actually, “Cloud” appears to have already moved across that chasm…bad example.)

When it comes to B2B marketing however, the Techno-bubble slowed adoption of Social Media Marketing.  For years consumer marketers, PR firms, Hollywood, etc. have been using Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, blogs, etc. to launch products and revive careers.  But you take a look at B2B and we’re still a long way from those heights.  However, I think that the change is really picking up momentum and Social Media Marketing has pierced the bubble from the outside in.

Here are some great Social Media Marketing stats (although 9 months old) and a cool track for your enjoyment.

Posted under marketing

This post was written by James Colgan on March 24, 2010

Tags: , ,

Cloud Computing – A Rose by any other name?

It is a testament to the times that as a new burgeoning technology is hatched by an ”army of geeks” in a caffeine drenched frenzy, I can have a conversation at a party with a lawyer from a completely different field and find that he already has a rudimentary grasp of that same technology - Cloud Computing

Even if I normalize for the natural demographic skew of my location (San Francisco), it is impressive to consider how quickly this phenomenon has progressed towards the mainstream.  Clearly, the message has a lot to do with the rate of transmission. 

Software-as-a-Service“, or worse “SaaS”, didn’t catch the imagination as well as “Cloud” did.  Which is ironic considering SaaS is actually what the consumer/user really interacts with.  What was originally represented by “The Cloud” was a metaphor for all of the networking, server hardware, protocols, etc. that no user in their right mind would want to know even existed, never mind have to understand. 

Even Marc Benioff, CEO of Salesforce.com, the original “Software-as-a-Service” company, writes in his letter to shareholders, “We have become the first enterprise Cloud Computing company to report more than $1 billion in revenue.”  He may argue that this is in line with their Force.com strategy - providing their compute power in the form of a “Platform-as-a-Service” (here we go again) – Sales Cloud 2.  But considering where the vast majority of those $1 billion came from, it more reflects the company’s savvy marketing team.  If a Cloud Computing company were to be defined as any company that provides compute resources as a utility, then wouldn’t Amazon have been the first $1 billion Cloud Computing company the moment they turned on AWS?  “SaaS” appears to have lost its luster and “Cloud Computing” is the “new black”.

The reality is, what you call something does matter.  And every successful company out there knows this.  To throw up your arms and quote Shakespeare is to miss the point, and likely doom your company/product to failure in the process.

To give something a name is to give it meaning.  Even better – a name should imbue the audience with a passion, an image, something that goes far beyond its function.  “Cloud Computing” does that, with very little effort….”SaaS” needed an education cycle, time, and resources, and the market really doesn’t have that kind of patience.

(If you’re curious, in 2006 SFDC was all about “CRM”, and press releases in 2008 described the company as “…the market and technology leader in Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) and Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS)”.)

Posted under industry, marketing

This post was written by James Colgan on February 12, 2010

Tags: , , ,

Experience and Education in EDA

When I was in 11th grade, my Social Studies teacher, Mr. Lewis, took us on a field trip from Brooklyn to Lower Manhattan. That was the first time I ate “real” Chinese food and it was also my first time in a “real” bookstore, The Strand.

Back then, circa 1980, it was very common for people to go browsing in used bookstores, and I caught the bug real bad. Not only was it an affordable way for a kid to buy books, but there was also something exciting and addicting about the serendipity of the process, not the least of which was the intoxicating fragrance of those weathered and worn volumes.  It was like a treasure hunt.

I never went in looking for any one book in particular, but I always walked out with half a dozen or more books on totally different subjects. In fact, if you were to look at my bookshelf today, over 80% of the books were purchased as “previously owned”. That’s one of the great things about books … even when they are used, they still retain 100% of their value!

John Dewey on Education

One of the books I’ve picked up over the years is “John Dewey on Education”, which is a compendium of excerpts of his various writings. For those of you who are unfamiliar, John Dewey was perhaps the most influential educational reformer of the late 19th and early 20th century, best known for his writings on the role of experience in education. In fact, several excerpts in this book are from Dewey’s other book, “Experience and Education“.

In this book, Dewey proposes 2 important ideas. First, that real learning only comes by connecting ideas with experience. Second, that every learning experience influences future learning experiences. For example, consider a child that touches a hot stove. Through that experience, he first learns that stoves are hot and not to be touched. A valuable lesson, indeed. Second, this experience teaches him to be cautious about touching objects he has not touched before. In that sense, it actually dampens his enthusiasm and curiosity for future experimentation, which can be harmful to future learning experiences. Not so good. As can be easily reasoned, the best learning happens through experiences that teach and also encourage future learning.

__________

Last week I came across a blog post by Jim Lipman entitled “So this is where Engineers get their Information“. It seems that Jim attended a seminar by eg3.com on how designers search on the internet. One portion of the blog post caught my attention:

In the “What do Designers Want” category, ‘hands-on’ items such as demos, software and evaluation kits rank very highly. On the flip side, vendor articles and webinars ranked moderately low and podcasts very low in response to a “What Information do you seek” question (the webinar response probably due to the same perception that I have that many are sales or marketing tools).

In other words, designers want to be educated through actual experience with the tools, not by listening to webinars or presentations or even podcasts. If you have spent any time around a teenager, you know that this tendency towards interactive experiences will only increase. No longer will designers be satisfied being passive receivers of information. Rather they will prefer, no, demand to be active participants.

Second, their experience accessing these forms of online learning will have an effect on their future learning habits. If they have to log in through several screens and enter personal information just to get access to a Webinar, fagetaboutit! They won’t come back. But if the process is simple and easy and the experience is smooth, they will come back.

That’s what we are trying to create at Xuropa. An environment where designers can learn by experience, by using your tools hands on and where they will come back again. We’re trying to make the process painless, just a simple password login and there they are using your tools in seconds. It’s not just another form of WebEx or VNC or any other screen sharing program as some have suggested, but a way for the designers to drive the tools themselves and learn first hand.

We’re just getting rolling and we’ve got a lot to learn by the experience as well. The process, although smooth, can still be improved. And we are working hard to get more valuable tools in place for designers to try out. If you are a designer reading this, go ahead and try out one of our labs and let us know what you liked and how we can improve. We really want to make this painless and rewarding for you. If you are in the EDA world, consider putting your tool in the hands of a customer and providing a learning experience whereby they fall in love with your tool.

It’s all about the Experience.

Posted under Xuropa, industry, marketing

This post was written by harrygries on September 2, 2009

Tags: , , , ,

Twitter Increasing Relevance

I’ve been writing a lot about Twitter recently, as have a lot of other people as it continues to charge into the mainstream.  Read What is Twitter, and Why Should I Care? and you’ll get an idea of where this is going, but we have some recent data collected by The Nielsen Company that talks to its increasing relevance as a communication channel:

It’s growth in terms of users is astronomical:

Fastest Growing Community in February 2009

Fastest Growing Community in February 2009

As Nielsen note, this growth does not take into account the number of mobile users, which could increase these stats incredibly.  Twitter’s use-model lends itself to mobile use perfectly, and is a very valid platform.

There is one piece of this story that I’d disagree with though: the title, “Twitter’s Sweet Smell of Success“.  While Twitter has raised an impressive $55M since its founding, it has yet to find a business model.  I’m sure there’s one out there, and it does not have to be solely ad-driven.  But until they have found the secret sauce to generating revenues, the sweet smell of success is still only appreciated by its users.

Posted under industry, marketing

This post was written by James Colgan on March 20, 2009

Tags: , ,

Roll-Your-Own Communities Won’t Work

Considering the number of open source tools available to create the basics of an online community site, it is tempting to go this route to leverage the ubiquity of the web.  Indeed, a couple of companies within electronic design have done this.  However, there are some fundamental reasons why this is a very bad idea and ultimately won’t work.

It’s only when you get into the web and community building business that you understand that there are two key elements to the process:

  • Building the platform (software)
  • Building the community (people)

It is easy to think that installing the software and configuring it is the hardest part.  This is the “build it and they will come” mentality.  Dead wrong.  If it’s on your own website there’s a great deal of work and maintenance required.  If it’s on an unrelated platform, you’ve just made your job harder for yourself.

If you’re a budget constrained organization take a look at the amount of effort and length of time it took John Cooley to build his audience (it’s not really a “community”).  A heck of a lot of guerilla marketing to get on everybody’s radar (and I would not want to maintain that site).  Or take Janick Bergeron’s Verification Guild.  It’s a relatively more modern web platform that allows interaction, but it has taken him years to build that community.

The problem is, you’re on your own.  Without some heavy duty marketing, how are you going to cut through the noise of the web?  It’s not the tool you use, but the fundamental marketing principles and effort behind the way you use the tool.

This is you

You on your own

There is another way  - to build your community within a group of communities with a point of commonality.  This way, there is a resonance from those around you that amplifies your efforts to build your own specific community.

So, for electronic design, you want to be building your community within a larger online electronic design community…this is Xuropa.

Your community on Xuropa

Your community on Xuropa

Building an online community is an on-going effort.  It needs to be fed and watered over time - daily.  This is hard to do when you’re a resource limited company.  But if you’re in amongst a number of other communities with a similar background, their efforts will help yours.  Leverage.

Of course, in addition to community functionality, you can have your software product at the heart of your community in an Online Lab.  That’s something that no other solution out there can provide.

So, please don’t waste your time, effort and money because the software’s “easy” to install and free.  You’re just taking a technical short cut that will make the whole process harder and the likelihood that you’ll achieve your objectives little to none.

Posted under Features, Xuropa, industry, marketing

This post was written by James Colgan on March 5, 2009

Tags: , ,

Twitter Update - Views from the Fringe

My blog post about “What is Twitter, and Why Should I Care?” had not been up more than a few hours when the Twitter stream offered up this perspective from John Stewart of the Daily Show.


As usual, it’s hilarious, made funnier by the more-than-grain of truth to it.  The clip highlights the extremes of the Twitter spectrum.  Of course, the reality lies somewhere in between.

Twitter can (and is) used for banalities.  And Twittering while attending an important speech broadcast simultaneously worldwide says more about the Twit(terer) than anything else.

Mass communication tools, like email or SMS, can be used for spam.  But, that does not mean that they don’t have their place and their appropriate business use models.

Some basic professional uses:

  • Product announcements (linking to a demonstration or blog post)
  • Instant polls
  • A low-cost help-line
  • Focus groups
  • Event announcements and simple coordination
  • Build and simply engage your users
  • Live streaming (of something that is NOT broadcast worldwide!)
  • Event (seminar, presentation) question submission (can be very effective)

How have you used Twitter professionally?

Posted under industry, marketing

This post was written by James Colgan on March 3, 2009

Tags: , ,