To Tweet or not to Tweet

First of all, an apology for bombarding my Twitter followers with news tweets.  I made the mistake of experimenting with my personal account and learned the downside of “open-air” product development.  The spigot has been turned off. 

This past week we’ve been experimenting with Twitter feeds and automation with the aim of solving a growing industry problem.  Ironically, the aim of our Twitter development work is to increase the SNR of industry news rather than decrease it.  We also aim to improve a news stream’s utility for the rest of the industry while overcoming a common user behavior.

There is a very large number of sources of news and valuable opinion to track in our industry.  The Xuropa platform gathers about 80 streams from across the industry which often yields over 400 items per day.  And the number of sources is actually growing - more blogs covering narrower and deeper segments of knowledge; and new neighboring industries such as Cloud Computing and Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) are starting to become of interest.  (By the way, if there’s a source that you think is important to the community you can add it yourself.)

And here’s the reason for the development:  While having all of your news in one place helps (a feed reader, or a customizable page like iNews on Xuropa, for example) , there is still an awful lot of news out there to scan through and know what is and is not of value.  Everyone is busy, and time is getting more scarce.

The most effective way to get the insight of what should be read is to leverage the community (”crowd sourcing“).  What the community reads is likely to be what is most valuable to read and should bubble up to the top for others to read. 

This is the basic principle behind Digg, but Digg doesn’t help electronic design.  We simply do not have a large enough community to compete with the volume of Consumer Electronics readers, for example.  “Using OCP and extensions to support system-level cache coherenceis never going to get to the top of Digg.  But it is currently #6 in today’s Top News in Xuropa.  ie. If you go to Xuropa iNews you’ll get a good idea of what news is being read and what you should maybe read yourself.  (There are still some discrepancies that we’re working on as we’re increasing the sophistication of the system, but you’ll get the idea.)

So, why Twitter?  This is all part of the “dissaggreated web”.  Specifically, you shouldn’t have to go to a particular website to get a utility it offers.  It sounds counter-intuitive, but that’s the way things are going. 

You shouldn’t have to come to Xuropa to read the article, but we need to make a note that a particular article has been read and that contributes to the ranking of that article.  The bigger the dataset we have to work on, the better the results we can present to the community.

While this is just the start of a small piece of what we’re doing on Xuropa, I hope this explains a little bit about where we see this going.

So, we’ve learned a lot in this past week.  (Unfortunately for some I did not learn fast enough.)  As always, any input, suggestions, or requests you may have, drop us a line, tweet, email, or comment.  Just no letters please - save the tree.

And finally, thank you to all those that provided feedback on this project.

- James

Posted under Community, Features, Xuropa, industry

This post was written by James Colgan on May 1, 2009

Tags: ,

We Don’t Need YASN!

Great - another acronym.  As twitter grows I expect more of these to come along.  Anyway, I saw it this morning on Harry Gries’ blog, and it stands for “Yet Another Social Network”.

Harry painstakingly gathered tweets from a thread and tied them all together into an interesting conversation.  You would not have got this conversation if you a) had not been “following” every member of the conversation and b) not been on Twitter at the exact time it was going on.  So, thanks Harry!

I put a pretty long comment on Harry’s blog, but there’s a point I’d like to emphasize.

JL Gray was wondering if “we” needed another social network when it came to Xuropa.  Of course, my answer to that is - he’s right, we need a professional network.  At the same time he was making that comment he added that using Cadence tools on Xuropa was “cool”.  And that’s the whole point - using the actual Cadence tools with no downloads, plug-ins, or license agreements is very cool.  But more to the point - it’s useful.  Xuropa is about providing a community that is useful and specific to your career and work.

Within a Xuropa Online Lab you can use the tools and ask questions of the tool’s application engineer directly; read the manual, or watch a video about how to use the tool.  At the same time, if you want to twitter about it, great!  Write a blog post, wonderful! Write about it on someone’s “wall”, knock yourself out!  Each of these social networks has its purpose and focus (or not).

Here’s a video introduction to one of the Cadence MIPI Labs on Xuropa:

This is what Xuropa is about.  Connecting engineers with technology.  The rest is up to you.

Posted under Community, Features, Xuropa, industry, marketing

This post was written by James Colgan on March 10, 2009

Tags: , ,

Social Networks Presage Professional Network Growth?

A new report published by Nielsen describes some incredible statistics related to the growth of Social Networks (or Member Communities) on the internet: Global Faces and Networked Places.

  • Two-thirds of the world’s Internet population visit a social network or blogging site
  • This sector accounts for nearly 10% of all internet time
  • This sector ranks higher than email as fourth most popular online sector (see below)

Ranking of Internet Sector Reach
Ranking of Internet Sector Reach

This probably reaffirms anecdotal evidence of older demographics newly discussing their “Facebook page”.  However, what is not as widely understood is the headway that has been made in terms of time.

“The staggering increase in the amount of time people are spending on these sites is changing the way people spend their time online and has ramifications for how people behave, share and interact within their normal daily lives.”   

 

Percentage of Internet Time Spent in Member Communities
Percentage of Internet Time Spent in Member Communities

Another interesting way to think of this increase in terms of internet “mindshare”:

“A year ago ‘Member Communities’ accounted for one in every 15 online minutes globally – now it accounts for one in every 11.” 

 

But it gets more interesting, and more relevant to electronic design.  Common wisdom within the industr is that the senior demographics do not participate in online member communities.  Times are a-changin’ - the highest level of growth is in the three demographic ranges from 35 years old and up beyond 64.

While anecdotal evidence points to an increased desire of these demographics to access the photographs and videos of younger relatives, that’s not the point.  As with all of these web 2.0 phenomena, consumer adoption and growth will drive corporate adoption as users become familiar with use models and more comfortable with the degree of access.

So, does this mean that every company should rush out and create a Facebook page?  I think they should consider one as part of a comprehensive internet marketing strategy.  But I would tell them that this should not be their primary online channel for two very closely related reasons.

“Much like a friendship, marketing on social networks requires continual investment – in terms of time and effort as opposed to financial – to be of value to both parties.

Any online relationship requires more time and effort than financial investment (great when cash is scarce!), but your task is going to be made harder within the chaos that is Facebook.  The noise level is too high for you to cut through efficiently.  Also, the consumer-facing perception of Facebook does not engender a conversation that will help reinforce your professional brand (without a huge amount of education and work on your part).  It’s also difficult to intelligently screen out visitors (customers, prospects, partners, competitors, employees, students, etc.) In a previous blog post I go into this topic in more detail.
An analogy - would you be better served looking to build a professional community at a football game or a trade show or conference?  A Super Bowl ad will cut through the noise, but can you afford the price tag?

So, use Facebook as a signpost to your community on a Professional Community Platform - that would be Xuropa - and build your community there.  Even better, place your product at the center of your community!

Posted under Community, Xuropa, industry, marketing

This post was written by James Colgan on March 9, 2009

Tags: , , ,

Free Online Electronic Design Career Centers Open

To quote Shakespeare’s Richard III, ”Now is the winter of our discontent”, or at least, we’re hoping that it doesn’t get much “colder”!  While pundits do say ”it” will still get worse before it gets better, the current economic climate will not last forever.  So, ever the optimist, the longer we’re in it, the closer we are to the end!

However, in this period of job (in)security, we’d like to announce that Xuropa has just opened two ”Job Centers” within the Online Electronic Design Community.

It’s perfectly FREE for anyone to list positions that are open and for job seekers to post their ideal career move.  Just go to one of the Job Center Online Booths and make your entry in the Forum or browse the positions and professionals as the forums become populated.

Once you’ve made a post to the Forum you’ll be automatically updated with any responses.  If you want to contact the poster, go to the posters Professional Profile and send them a message.  Email addresses are kept strictly confidential, but we facilitate you making the connection.

Note however that we do not allow any anonymous postings.

Of course, this ties in closely to your Professional Profile on Xuropa.  Ensure this is current either manually or by importing your LinkedIn profile.  Also, make sure your list of specializations and skills is up to date.  LinkedIn doesn’t cover these aspects of an electronic design professionals background, so you’ll need to do this manually.

Good luck, what ever you’re looking for!

Posted under Community, career, industry

This post was written by James Colgan on January 28, 2009

Tags: , , , , ,

Xuropa Community: Semiconductor Field Surge

Now that 2009 is well underway, I took a quick look at Xuropa membership registrations and the high-level makeup of the Xuropa community. 

Up until the end of last year, there was a pretty even split between the number of people that registered under the different electronic design fields (EDA, IP, Semiconductor, Software, and System).   The proportion of professionals that associated themselves with the Semiconductor and EDA fields were a little bit ahead, but not by much. 

Over the past few weeks this has changed.  Here’s the split as of today:

System: 17%
Software: 17%
Semiconductor:47%
IP: 13%
EDA: 41%

Considering the relative size of the Semiconductor segment in terms of employees I would expect this profile to become more pronounced.  You can see this breakdown for yourself within the Community area of the platform.

Posted under Community

This post was written by James Colgan on January 16, 2009

Tags: , , , , , , ,