Top 10 Interlaken Protocol IP Cores and Verification IP

Interlaken is the name of a very picturesque town in Switzerland (pictured), but it’s also the name of the next communications protocol that will be driving a cloud near you! Maybe the fact that Interlaken, the town, sits between two huge lakes in the Alps is what inspired the name of the protocol. Think of the lakes as huge pools of data that needs to move from one lake to another. You get the idea.

Chip-to-chip bandwidth is one of the major bottlenecks in cloud computing as the amount of data that needs to be moved around increases incessantly. Cisco and Cortina Systems recognized the need in 2006 and announced the protocol.  The two companies joined with Silicon Logic Engineering (now part of Open-Silicon) in 2007, and put out an Interlaken Technology White Paper.

The whitepaper summarizes the protocol, “Interlaken is an interconnect protocol optimized for highbandwidthand reliable packet transfers. It uses bundles of serial links to create a logical connection between components with multiple channels, backpressure capability, and data-integrity protection to boost the performance of communications equipment.”

So, if you were to design and verify an Interlaken core on your next chip integration.  Where would you get your IP core, and where would you get your Verification IP (VIP)? After looking around, this is what we found.

Interlaken Controller IP Core
Open-Silicon’s Interlaken IP is a scalable, high-speed chip-to-chip interface protocol that builds on the channelization and per-channel flow control features of SPI4.2, while reducing the number of chip I/O pins by using high-speed SerDes technology, similar to XAUI…more
Interlaken IP Core
Xilinx Interlaken IP core is based on Sarance Technologies Best-In-Class Intellectual Property
Interlaken is a scalable chip-to-chip interconnect protocol designed to enable transmission speeds from 10Gbps to 150Gbps…more
Altera’s Interlaken intellectual property (IP) continues to scale with today’s demand for more bandwidth and higher performance needs…more
Interlaken Controller IP Core
Flowgic’s Interlaken IP core is an efficient implementation of Interlaken Protocol version 1.2. Interlaken IP core is designed for flexibility, robustness, scalability and is available in 64(10-20 Gb/s), 128(20-40Gb/s), 256(40-80Gb/s) and 384(80-120Gb/s) bit datapath variants…more
Interlaken IP Core
The Interlaken is a high speed, narrow, channelized and highly configurable chip-to-chip interface protocol. It offers programmable burst sizes, per-channel backpressure, source-asynchronous nature and scalability…more
3G to 600G Interlaken ILK and ILA IP Core
Tamba offers industry’s lowest latency, power, and size solution for the Interlaken communication protocol. The Universal Interlaken IP Core can be customized from 1 Gbps to 600 Gbps and targeted to both FPGA and ASIC platforms…more
XCI4FIC 100G Interlaken Fabric Interface Core
The Xelic 100G Interlaken Fabric Interface Core (XCI4FIC) provides the flexible transport of channelized signals for both segment mode and packet mode transmission formats with configurable lane number support. Flow control is provided for both in-band and out-of-band methods with optional automatic and override insertion capability…more
Interlaken VIP
The Interlaken Verification IP is compliant with 1.2 specifications and verifies Interlaken interfaces of designs Interlaken Interface. It can work with SystemVerilog,Vera, SystemC, E and Verilog HDL environment…more
Rockfish Technologies
INTERLAKEN ASIC IP
The Optimized Interlaken Protocol IP block from Rockfish Technology supports all the published extensions and interoperability recommendations from the Interlaken Alliance including…more
Rockfish Technologies
INTERLAKEN VERIFICATION IP
The Vermilion BFM bridges the gap between the user’s testbench and an Interlaken Device Under Test (DUT). Vermilion BFM Egress Interlaken Framing Layer Features…more


Posted under cloud, software

This post was written by James Colgan on March 8, 2013

Tags: , , ,


 

Atrenta to Participate in Formal Verification, Energy Efficiency and 3D Sessions at DATE 2013

Date: Thursday, March 21, 2013
Time: 1100 - 1230
Location / Room: Chartreuse

Automatically computing abstractions of large circuits combined with powerful SAT and SMT solvers is key to the success of formal verification techniques. The papers of this session present significant improvements in abstraction techniques and SAT/SMT-based optimizations. SAT- and SMT-abstractions are guided by unsatisfiable cores. Three papers address the issue of reducing the size of interpolants generated during the construction of abstractions. The second paper proposes a new abstraction technique demonstrating a significant improvement in gate-level abstractions.

For more information, go here.


Posted under software

This post was written by James Colgan on March 6, 2013

Tags:


 

SoC Integration - What’s All the Fuss About?

Came across a great panel discussion from DAC 2012 that’s really worth a watch. Hosted by David Murray of Duolog, the panel includes Mike Stellfox of Cadence, Harry Foster of Mentor Graphics, Paul Martin of ARM, and Warren Stapleton of AMD.

The main thrust of the conversation is centered on SoC integration efficiency and how SoC verification has become a major component or driver of it.

Take a look here:

Closely related to this topic are the tools that Duolog provide to increase SoC integration efficiency. You can try these tools out for free on the cloud here:

Duolog’s Weaver tool has a unique rules-based integration methodology that offers an intuitive, highly automated, scalable solution for IP integration and system assembly.
Duolog’s Bitwise tool manages HW/SW register, memory-map and interface definitions for IPs, subsystems or SoCs. Bitwise automatically generates specifications for register and memory-map information.
Duolog’s Spinner tool specifies the complete I/O layer, auto-generates multiple design views and enables seamless integration of the I/O fabric with the rest of the system.


Posted under software

This post was written by James Colgan on March 5, 2013

Tags: