My visit to Facebook (the company)

I visited Facebook last week.  I’ve gotten a lot of emails asking me about how my visit was so I promised everyone that I’d do a blog post about it.

It was a very interesting experience.  I went there to see a friend who is working in the R&D group.  What I saw there was a great feeling of team, bright individuals, innovation, energy, and openness.

It reminded me of EDA in the late 80’s — at least my experience in VLSI’s software group.  VLSI was a renegade semiconductor company which started the ASIC model along with LSI Logic.  Everyone viewed us as they view Facebook today: “This is all cool stuff, but how are they going to make a profitable business out of this?!!

At that point, VLSI only hired the best from the best schools (as Facebook does today).  We were mostly in our early 20’s (as Facebook today).  We worked together, had lunch together, partied together, shared housing together, even dated (as in Facebook today): Work was more than just work (and in fact to this day some of my closest friends post-college are those I met at VLSI).  As my friend and I had lunch in the Facebook café (yes, it was free food!), I noticed a lot of similarities with those days in EDA.

As it always happens, EDA matured (as semi had before that) and companies became “corporations”.  Work became just work.  It really makes me wonder about the whole dynamic around corporations: less entrepreneurial, closed, paranoid, ….  I always wondered, for example, why don’t corporations use Macs.  Macs are better (performance), must safer, cost compatible, and open.  My thought: Macs just don’t fit the bill because they’re just not “corporate”.  As it turns out, corporations are also having a hard time today dealing with Facebook, or social networking in general - Facebook is not “corporate” either.

In the mid 90’s, corporations were struggling to deal with “this internet thing”.  A lot of companies were limiting employees access because they feared employees would just waste their time browsing.  I used to hear that argument all the time.  Could you imagine if someone would limit the use of the internet at work today?  All employees (and management) would be up in arm asking “how’d we get our jobs done?!!”

So 15 years later and now corporations are questioning Facebook.  They’re looking for ways to limit employees time on Facebook, or other social network/media for that matter.  Instead they can be greatly leveraging it.  There is an insightful article in FastCompany magazine this month about how Cisco is embracing social network within the company to dramatically invigorate innovation and leadership.  It’s a bold move by John Chambers (Cisco CEO), one that requires openness, something not typically “corporate”.

Cisco’s vision is highly appliable to electronic design companies.  Xuropa is enabling professional networking dynamics built around technology-networking (a la social-networking) focused on the entire electronic design supply chain.  Xuropa’s platform is something that electronic design companies can leverage (just as Cisco’s already doing using other social/professional networks), to revitalize innovation and leadership, and significantly impact the bottom line.

Back to Facebook:  We, as high tech professional, have been taught to believe that someone needs to have a need first, and then we’d create the solution — and more complicated the solution the better.  As I talk around the industry, I run into people who are upset (and even belligerent) about why Facebook is getting so much attention.   “What are they trying to solve?”, I’m often asked.

What I find Facebook’s genius to be is that they (most likely by luck, and perhaps because they just didn’t know anything different) identified a trend (that people spend more time on the web than TV, phone, radio, writing letters, reading books, etc. combined) and created a fairly simple platform to enable what people would usually do on TV, phone, etc.  They didn’t wait for a problem, they just closed their eyes and imagined “what if …”.  That is really the genius behind the Facebooks, the Nings, and the Xuropa’s.

Click here to read other posts or subscribe to my blog.

Posted under Xuropa, business, career, industry, marketing

Chips Enable Voting By Cell Phone

Semiconductors have worked their way into the heart of democracy in Estonia.  According to an Information Week article, cell phone owners get a free authorized chips that verify the owner’s identity and participation in the system.

Also according to the article, this is the next step forward for the country that instituted voting by internet in 2007.

Here is an opportunity for the US government to invest in infrastructure building central to its democracy.  It would result in a nice bit of stimulation to the high-tech industry and the economy as a whole.

Anyone know who provides the technology behind the Estonian system?

Click here to register for the Xuropa Online Electronic Design Community

Posted under business, industry

This post was written by James Colgan on December 12, 2008

Tags:


 

Cloud Computing, SaaS and Electronic Design (Part 4)

In the previous posts in this series we covered some definitions of cloud computing; drivers of the transition to cloud computing by electronic design tools; and a potential roadmap for how this transition could look over time for the EDA tool flow.

In this post we conclude the series with a discussion of different approaches to Cloud Computing.

Remote Access and Cloud Computing Approaches

Cloud Computing could be thought of in different ways, but as with the adoption of most new technologies it will be gradual and in different forms.

Tool Access Models

Tool Access Models

Beyond the completely locally hosted scenario, there are three basic remote access and SaaS models available today.

VNC (Virtual Network Computing)

This scenario is built upon technology and tools that have been commercially for a few years now. It takes quite a bit of maintenance and support on its own and is not extremely user friendly on its own. However, many electronic design firms are using this for different phases of technology adoption. Engineers also typically use VNC to access tools that are internally hosted.

This is not “Software as a Service”. It an ad hoc technology that provides remote access in a bare knuckle fashion. Software needs to be installed on the server and the client to set up the environment. Connections are set up from the command line and not very user friendly.

EDA SaaS 1.0

As has been productized within a Xuropa Online Lab™, this is an infrastructure that provides systematic, secure remote access to an EDA tool without any installation, setup or teardown by the user. The tool is available on demand and provides for an ideal environment within which to carry out many of the tool adoption phases above.

SaaS and Tool Adoption Proces

SaaS and Tool Adoption Process

Also, a Xuropa Online Lab can be extended to provide a design environment allowing the user to upload and download design files. This last model can be adapted to provide SaaS remote access to the EDA tool and would be ideally suited to perform evaluations and even utility of some tools under the right use-model.

For existing EDA tools, this is the shortest, most secure and economical way to place your product in the cloud to provide global access to your market.

The hardware supporting this environment could be a dedicated server or a server farm running virtualization software to maximize resource utility and lower costs. The hardware could be an internal or leased server farm with VMWare or Parallels software. There are other commercial providers of Cloud Computing, the most widely quoted is Amazon with their EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud).

Above and beyond the Xuropa Online Lab, Xuropa provides services to extend this product to accommodate different use- and business-models. Please inquire for details: sales@xuropa.com.

EDA SaaS 2.0

Using similar hardware configurations as described with SaaS 1.0, this architecture requires the replacement of an existing user interface with a web-based user interface. Alternatively, a new company wishing to broaden the reach of their core tool engine would begin by building a web interface and make it scalable and accessible globally from the start.

There are two early examples of this within electronic design today. Think Silicon provides IPGenius™ as a web service to generate IP cores from different configurations. PDTi™ provides a web-based tool called SpectaReg that is a web enabled collaborative development environment for addressable register interfaces within an SoC. In the past 3 or 4 years this space has become crowded with competing commercial solutions or internally developed frameworks. A SaaS approach is a great way to compete on business model and support model.

[You might want to have a paragraph of the issues/costs of maintaining two versions, one a “regular old” EDA version and a second SaaS version of the tool. And perhaps how Xuropa knows and can offer services to reduce that cost. Just a thought!]

The business model will also migrate from a per-seat time-license model that the user has little control over to a cost-per-“X”, model where “X” can be a number of different parameters. For example, X could be the number of bugs found, the number of cores integrated, the number of regressions run, the length of time the tool was used, the number of designs created, the number of micro-watts saved, etc. ie. the model could be a simpler time/user-based model, but it could also be more tightly tide to the value a particular tool delivers. And the real power of this model is that these metrics can be measured.

Not only can more creative business models be created, but they will make more sense and be more easily and naturally support by both vendor and user.

If there wasn’t such inertia within the existing EDA business models the business model could be a driver that trends gradually towards change, but then experience a significant “tipping point” as a major player changes the rules of the game.

Whether your company is looking to move an existing tool to the web, or is developing a tool for a SaaS model from scratch, it is important that you focus your resources on your core value proposition – your tool’s engine. Xuropa SaaS Design Services is the ideal strategic partner to collaborate with. Leverage our web and EDA expertise and the Xuropa Infrastructure to realize your SaaS vision. Contact us for more information sales@xuropa.com.

Conclusion

We’re at the beginning of a trend, but without a doubt it is a trend. There are 4 key drivers to the development of the use of Cloud Computing and the adoption of SaaS as a business model, and gradually these drivers will align for different products and different companies.

While the drivers do not align for some companies and products just yet, the electronic design industry is primed for a change of this magnitude. Business pressures due to macro-economic “re-adjustments” could be the catalyst for the trend. Also, for those start-up EDA companies that either cannot get funding or are not able to obtain their Series B or C, moving to a SaaS model could be the only way to penetrate accounts, global markets, lower the cost of sales and out maneuver their competition. It might even be a way to get VC’s interested in EDA again…maybe.

SaaS also offers opportunities to semiconductor vendors. It is a way for them to reduce their total cost of ownership and increase their flexibility. Not all of their CAD department is tightly coupled with their value proposition. In much the same way as having a fab no longer became essential to a semiconductor’s success, an internal CAD department could go the same way through SaaS and Cloud Computing.

Finally, there are many benefits to SaaS and a Cloud Computing model for the end user. They always have access to the latest revision of the tool without the pain of installation and transition. They also have an environment that is architected to operate in a distributed and collaborative fashion across specializations and teams. This will remove a lot of the friction and inefficiencies within geographically distributed companies. And the business will be a pay-as-you-use or a results/value-delivery model, which should result in a higher return-on-investmet.

If you’re considering making the move, drop us a line and let’s discuss. sales@xuropa.com or register within the community and send me an email from my Xuropa Professional Profile – Search for James Colgan within the Community area.

Click here to register for the Xuropa Online Electronic Design Community

Connect with me:

Posted under Features, Xuropa, business, industry, marketing

This post was written by James Colgan on December 12, 2008

Tags: , , , ,